Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Lecter series - unified analysis - part 2: Lecter is attempting to be reborn

CATEGORY: MOVIES

We know from part 3 of the analysis of Hannibal, that Lecter wants to experience the beatific vision, that is, he wants to see God. In the bible, Gospel of John chapter 3, verse 3, Jesus says to Nicodemus [New International Version]:

"I tell you the truth, no one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again."

Lecter needs to be reborn in order to see the kingdom of God. In The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (Volume 9, part 1 of The Collected Works), Swiss psychologist and psychiatrist Carl Jung described five forms of rebirth. Let us look at each of these, and try to determine whether Lecter goes through any of them (in The Silence of the Lambs or Hannibal).

1. Metempsychosis (also called transmigration of souls): "According to this view, one's life is prolonged in time by passing through different bodily existences; or, from another point of view, it is a life-sequence interrupted by different reincarnations. Even in Buddhism...it is by no means certain whether continuity of personality is guaranteed or not: there may be only a continuity of karma."[a]

Lecter would have to have had a sequence of existences prior to modern day, to fit the definition of metempsychosis. We have no indication that Lecter has had prior existences.

2. Reincarnation. "Here the human personality is regarded as continuous and accessible to memory, so that, when one is incarnated or born, one is able, at least potentially, to remember that one has lived through previous existences and that these existences were one's own...As a rule, reincarnation means rebirth in a human body."[b]

As stated above, we have no indication that Lecter has had previous existences. Therefore, the criteria for reincarnation are not met.

The topic of Lecter's attempted rebirth is continued in the next post.


a. Jung, C.G. The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 9, Part 1. Princeton University Press, 1969. para. 200.
b. Ibid., para. 201.


      





Disclaimers
1) In certain instances it has been determined that the creators of some of the productions analyzed on this blog, and/or the creators of source material(s) used in the making of these productions, may be making negative statements about certain segments of society in their productions. These statements should be taken as expressing the opinions of no one other than the creators.

2) This blog is not associated with any of the studios, creators, authors, publishers, directors, actors, musicians, writers, editors, crew, staff, agents, or any other persons or entities involved at any stage in the making of any of the media productions or source materials that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced herein.

3) In keeping with the policies of the filmmakers, authors, studios, writers, publishers, and musicians, that have created the productions (and their source materials) that are analyzed, mentioned, or referenced on this blog, any similarity of the characters in these films or source materials to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All images on this blog are used solely for non-commercial purposes of analysis, review, and critique.

All Wikipedia content on this blog, and any edits made to it, are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Marcus Aurelius's Meditations - from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Augustine's Confessions and City of God from Wikisource (except where otherwise noted); portions from Wikisource used on this blog are released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0.

Saint Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica from the 'Logos Virtual Library' website (except where otherwise noted), compiled and edited by Darren L. Slider; believed to be in public domain.